Anti-Human Herpes Virus 6 Type B Antibodies Make Up the Oligoclonal
Bands in Multiple Sclerosis
Dr. Luc Vande Gaer, Dr. Ernest Van den Driessche, Dr. Marleen Van den Driessche
Multiple Sclerosis and Rehabilitation Center, Overpelt, Belgium
_________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT: Background: There is considerable Oepidemiological
evidence that a latent or slow infection with human herpes virus 6 is associated with the
etiology of multiple sclerosis. However, techniques for detecting anti-human herpes virus
6 antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid had been lacking up to the time of this study.
Preliminary results were presented at the Second International Conference on Human
Herpesviruses 6, 7 and 8 (Italy, Pisa, May 8-11, 1997). Methods We therefore adapted the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in order to make this determination.
_________________________________________________________________________
Cerebrospinal fluid was examined in two population samples: multiple
sclerosis patients and a control group who had a disease other than multiple sclerosis. It
was established that IgG antibodies to human herpes virus 6 type b were present in the
cerebrospinal fluid of all of the multiple sclerosis patients but in none of the controls.
Results with the adapted assay, we were also able to show that in the multiple sclerosis
patients the nidus of the anti-human herpes virus 6 type b antibodies is the oligoclonal
bands in the cerebrospinal fluid and that these bands contain no other antibodies.
Conclusions The significance of this discovery is at least three-fold: i) it may now be
possible to make firmer diagnoses of multiple sclerosis; ii) the hypothesis of a causal
role of human herpes virus 6 type b in multiple sclerosis is strengthened, so that; iii)
the idea of combating multiple sclerosis by developing drugs that target this virus
becomes more plausible.
In Flanders (Belgium), multiple sclerosis (MS) is widespread. In fact,
its prevalence is about 87.9 per per 100,000 inhabitants. The possibility that viral
infection plays a role in MS is supported by data suggesting that an as yet undetermined
childhood viral exposure somehow induces a susceptibility to the disease. These findings
emerged from various migration and epidemiological studies. Viral infections may induce an
exacerbation of MS and some MS patients have inappropiate immune responses to certain
viruses, presenting higher antibody titers than controls against measles, herpes simplex,
varicella, rubella and Epstein-Barr virus, as determined in the serum and CSF.
Human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) causes exanthem sabitum (or roseola
infantum), a benign disease and small children. Epidemiological data confirm that a
substantial percentage of childrem become infected with HHV-6 by the age of 1-2 years. The
infection is most probably transmitted via saliva the agent is readily detected in this
fluid and the salivary glands. Recently, the possible role of HHV-6 type b (HHV-6b)
specifically in MS has been investigated. In particular, Challoner et al established that
HHV-6 was present in the oligodendrocyte nuclei of MS patients but not of controls.
The point of departure of our work was the circumstance that although
epidemiological evidence pointed clearly to the implication of HHV-6 in MS, the technical
limitations of current detection methods posed a severe obstacle to investigation of the
CSF. Our answer to this problem was to adapt the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
(Biotrin, Ireland), thereby opening up to research the role of HHV-6 in MS. In the light
of the above-noted findings on the association of HHV-6 with the etiology of MS, we
reasoned that the corresponding antibodies should be present in the CSF of persons with
the disease and possibly these persons only. We therefore set out to examine, in a
prospective study, the CSF of MS patients and of (non-MS) controls, which was now possible
owing to the adapted ELISA. In addition, in a later phase of our investigation we decided
it would be useful to determine whether the nidus of these antibodies, and these
antibodies alone, was the oligoclonal bands; such a finding could increase current
diagnostic power in MS. Finally, given the above-noted exacerbating effect of viruses
other than HHV-6 in MS, we wanted to examine the CSF of MS patients and controls for
antibodies to these pathogens. We reasoned that since the blood-brain barrier is defective
in MS, the titers of these antibodies might be higher in this population.
METHODS
This study was carried out on two population samples: MS patients,
and patients with a disease other than MS, who served as controls. There were out-patients
and inpatients in both groups. Out-patients were approached to participate in the study in
the order in which they presented, and in-patients in the order in which we happened on
them in the hospital. The MS profiles fell into three categories: chronic progressive,
relapsing-remitting and first flare-up. At least one lumbar punction (LP) had been
performed in each patients entering in the first two categories, whereas no LP had been
carried out in the third category of MS patients. The investigator who perform the LP was
different from the investigator who perform the CSF analyses, and in all but two of the 78
patients under study the former did not communicate any medical information whatsoever to
the latter. The controls were randomly selected among patients for whom an LP was required
for their condition. A local ethics committee approved the investigation and ruled that to
be admitted, a patient had to fully understand its nature and purpose.
To be entered to the MS group patients had to meet the following
diagnostic criteria: history of clinical symptoms; a Kurtzke expanded disability status
scale score of at least 1.0; presence of one or more oligoclonal band in the CSF on IEF.
These patients were recruited from the Multiple Sclerosis and Rehabilitation Center in
Overpelt (Belgium). The control group were recruited from various Belgian hospitals from
among patients who had a disease other than MS. To be entered, these patients had to be
negative for MS, although they were allowed to present one or more oligoclonal bands, and
in addition, either MS clinical symptoms or a Kurtzke expanded disability status scale
score of at least 1.0.
Two assays were carried out on each CSF sample. First, an ELISA was
done to identify CSF antibodies and to determine their concentration. For this technique,
the CSF antibody concentration was considered adequate. The optical density (OD) was
automatically calculated from the microplate results. ODs below 0.200 were considered as
indicating that no antibodies were present (diagnostic cut-off). This criterion is also
applied for the results of dosing techniques used in serology and endocrinology. In the
ELISA, antibodies of the IgG class, when present, combine with HHV-6b antigen attached to
the polystyrene surface of the microwell test strips. Residual CSF is removed by washing
and peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG was added. The microwells were washed and a
colorless substrate system (tetramethylbenzidine/hydrogen peroxide) was added. The
substrate was hydrolyzed by the enzyme and the chromogen turns blue. After the reaction
was stopped with acid, the tetramethyl-benzidine turned yellow. The concentration of
anti-HHV-6b antibodies in the test sample was proportional to the intensity of the color
and this intensity was, in turn, proportional to the OD of the antibodies. As controls, we
used serum with 36 IU antibodies/ml diluted 100-fold and also a CSF with an OD > 1.000.
The second test performed on each CSF sample was an IFA, which was
carried out after a five-fold dilution. In this system the indirect immunofluorescent
method of antibody detection and titer determination was used. Patient CSF sample were
incubated with immobilized HHV-6b antigen and stabilized on a glass slide. If anti HHV-6b
IgG antibodies were present in the sample, a stable complex formed with the antigen. Bound
antibody was then reacted with a fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-human IgG and this
complex was visualized with the aid of a fluorescence microscope. A positive antibody
reaction was indicated by bright green fluorescence at the antigen sites. As controls, we
used the same samples as in the ELISA.
These two test techniques were applied in triplicate in the same
laboratory on the same day. In addition, for each CSF sample the protein and IgG
concentrations were determined and the intrathecal production of HHV-6b IgG antibodies was
confirmed.
The literature states that in the normal population the ratio of a mean
concentration of IgG in the CSF to a mean concentration of IgG in the serum is 1/289. Such
a low concentration in both MS patients and persons with a disease other than MS exclude
false positive results.
Up to the time of the study, the Biotrin technique was used only for
serum analyses, for which Biotrin recommends a 100-fold dilution of the serum. If we had
used the Biotrin technique on CSF, we would have had to concentrate the CSF by a factor of
3 in order to bring it to the level recommended by Biotrin for serum, but that is
technically impossible with the ELISA. We therefore used unconcentrated CSF for the ELISA,
and despite Biotrin´s recommendation, managed in this way to determine the OD of the
anti-HHV-6b antibodies in the CSF, as validated by the diagnostic index.
With the IFA, on the other hand, concentrating is possible; with the
AMICON filter, this can be done 5-fold or a multiple thereof. Accordingly, we concentrated
the CSF 5-fold and obtained a concentration of 1/60, which approximates the 100-fold
dilution recommended by Biotrin. We were thus able to detect whether there were anti
HHV-6b antibodies in the CSF.
In a second phase of the investigation, after the oligoclonal bands had
been isolated by IEF, we used the ELISA to calculate the OD of the anti-HHV-6b antibodies
making up these bandsl. This determination was carried out only on patients for whom the
OD of the CSF was > 0.800. The reason for the
cut-off was that diluting CSF of a lower OD would have resulted in an inadequate volume of
supernatant. In this application of the ELISA, after focusing and before fixation,
oligoclonal bands on the agarose gel were removed with a scalpel, subsequently submerged
in 1.5 ml physiological saline (9.0 g NaCl/l, pH 5.9) and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C
with regular stirring at 5-minute intervals. After centrifugation of the CSF, the ELISA
was carried out on the supernatant.
The eluate of the agarose gel (pH 7) was used as a control. Each
agarose gel was filled with 8 CSF samples from each patient, so that a total of 120 ul
of CSF was required (8 times 15 ul).
RESULTS
A total of 46 MS patients were recruited (mean age 38.0 yrs,
range 25 64). There were 31 women and 15 men. The mean Kurtzke expanded disability
status scale score for the group was 2.7 (range 1.0-3.5) and isoelectric focusing (IEF)
disclosed a mean of 4.7 oligoclonal bands per patient (range: 1-15). The MRI yielded a
mean of 7.1 lesions per patient (range 5-11). In all, 28 controls were entered to the
study (mean age 43.9 yrs, range 20-67). There were 18 women and 10 men. In this group, the
diseases broke down as follow: 20 patients-radiculopathy, for which a LP was performed for
myelography; 3 patients-cerebellar degeneration; 2 patients-Friedreich´s ataxia; 1
patient-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; 2 patients-rheumatoid arthritis. No control patient
presented oligoclonal bands, 6 patients had two or more anomalies on clinical neurological
examination, and for these patients the mean Kurtzke expanded disability status scale sore
was 4.8 (range: 3-6). In both study groups each patient presented an IgG formation in the
CSF. In the MS group the mean IgG concentration was 8.6 mg/dl (range 1.4-19.7) (Table 1)
vs. 2.0mg/dl in the controls (range 0.5-5.6) (Table 2).
There was a higher production of IgG antibodies to HHV-6b in the serum
of MS patients (mean 25.2 IU/I) than in that of the controls (mean 18 IU/I).
**
Tabla 2. Analysis of cerebrospinal
fluid by IEF, ELISA, IFA in a control group of patients who had various neurological
diseases other than MS (n=28). |
Patient
no. |
IEF
(no. Of)
bands |
IgG
(mg/dl) |
IFA |
ELISA
(OD) |
Age
(yrs) |
Disease |
1 |
0 |
1.4 |
negative |
0.035 |
30 |
N |
2 |
0 |
0.5 |
negative |
0.135 |
20 |
N |
3 |
0 |
2.8 |
negative |
0.142 |
48 |
N |
4 |
0 |
0.7 |
negative |
0.072 |
43 |
CD |
5 |
0 |
0.5 |
negative |
0.117 |
66 |
N |
6 |
0 |
2.5 |
negative |
0.080 |
58 |
RA |
7 |
0 |
1.0 |
negative |
0.000 |
36 |
N |
8 |
0 |
2.2 |
negative |
0.128 |
62 |
N |
9 |
0 |
1.9 |
negative |
0.078 |
47 |
F |
10 |
0 |
2.5 |
negative |
0.041 |
70 |
N |
11 |
0 |
2.7 |
negative |
0.170 |
45 |
F |
12 |
0 |
2.6 |
negative |
0.080 |
38 |
N |
13 |
0 |
2.8 |
negative |
0.113 |
48 |
ALS |
14 |
0 |
2.5 |
negative |
0.096 |
60 |
N |
15 |
0 |
2.7 |
negative |
0.128 |
67 |
N |
16 |
0 |
1.1 |
negative |
0.090 |
40 |
RA |
17 |
0 |
0.7 |
negative |
0.050 |
48 |
CD |
18 |
0 |
1.6 |
negative |
0.184 |
45 |
N |
19 |
0 |
1.4 |
negative |
0.096 |
32 |
N |
20 |
0 |
2.2 |
negative |
0.025 |
50 |
N |
21 |
0 |
5.6 |
negative |
0.124 |
49 |
N |
22 |
0 |
4.0 |
negative |
0.097 |
32 |
N |
23 |
0 |
1.0 |
negative |
0.048 |
28 |
N |
24 |
0 |
1.9 |
negative |
0.194 |
36 |
CD |
25 |
0 |
1.9 |
negative |
0.167 |
32 |
N |
26 |
0 |
2.0 |
negative |
0.135 |
43 |
N |
27 |
0 |
1.7 |
negative |
0.125 |
21 |
N |
28 |
0 |
1.6 |
negative |
0.075 |
35 |
N |
N: no central neurological disease.
CD: cerebellar degeneration; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; F: Friedreichs
ataxia; ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IEF: inmunofluorescent assay; ELISA
enzymelinked inmunosorbent assay. |
The immunofluorescent assay (IFA) was positive for all MS patients and
negative for all controls. In the MS group the mean OD of the antibodies to HHV-6b in the
CSF as determined by the ELISA was 0.475 (range: 0.228-2.206) (Table I) vs. 0.101 (range:
0.000-0.194) in the controls (Table 2). The repetability of this measurement was high (SD:
0.039)
A diagnostic index was calculated so as to validate the ELISA and IFA
results. This index is defined by the following expression: S (Sensitivy) + SP
(Specificity), where S=TP/(TP+FN) and SP=TN/(TN+FP), where in turn TP=true positives,
FN=false negatives, TN=true negatives and FP=false positives. For a resultto be valid the
value of the diagnostic index has to lie within a range of 1 to 2. For both the ELISA and
the IFA, the sensitivy was 1.0, the specificity 1.0 and the diagnostic index 2.0, so that
the results for these parameters were valid.
In the MS patients antibodies to viruses other than HHV-6b were present
in the CSF as follows: against measles 41.3%, against mumps 47.8%, against rubella 34.8%
and against varicella 39.1% (Table 3). In 15 of these patients antibodies were present
against two viruses, in 6 patients against three viruses and in 4 patients against four
viruses. In the controls, no antibodies were detected against measles, mumps, rubella or
varicella.
In the second phase of the study, the oligoclonal bands in the alkaline
phase of the CSF of the MS patients were found to consist entirely of antibodies against
HHV-6b. Antibodies against other viruses, like measles, mumps, rubella and varicella, were
found in the acidic phase of the CSF. A total of 6 patients met the criterion of a CSF OD>0.800
for the determination of the OD of the isolated oligoclonal band with the ELISA, and the
mean OD obtained was 0.360.
Tabla 3. Presence of antibodies in
the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients (n = 46) |
Patients no. Measles Mumps Rubella
Varicella |
1 |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
2 |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
5 |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
11 |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
12 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
16 |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
17 |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
18 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
19 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
20 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
21 |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
22 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
24 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
26 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
27 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
28 |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
29 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30 |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
31 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
32 |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
33 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
34 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
35 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
36 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
37 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
38 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
39 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
40 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
41 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
42 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
43 |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
44 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
45 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
46 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
DISCUSSION